Understanding GST Rule 88C: Addressing GSTR-1 and GSTR-3B Mismatches
Rule 88C has been introduced into the CGST Rules to address persistent mismatches between GSTR-1 and GSTR-3B tax liabilities. This new provision facilitates automated intimations to taxpayers via the GST portal when discrepancies exceed set thresholds. It requires taxpayers to either settle the differential tax with interest or provide a valid explanation within seven days. Non-compliance can lead to the blocking of future GSTR-1 filings and initiation of recovery proceedings under Section 79.
The government has consistently addressed discrepancies in Goods and Services Tax (GST) liabilities reported between GSTR-1 and GSTR-3B since GST's implementation. To streamline this process, a new provision, Rule 88C, has been incorporated into the Central Goods and Services Tax (CGST) Rules, 2017. This rule mandates automated notifications to taxpayers whenever a significant difference is detected between the tax payable declared in GSTR-1 (or IFF) and GSTR-3B, based on predefined thresholds. Should a taxpayer fail to remit the outstanding amount or provide a satisfactory explanation, subsequent GSTR-1 filings may be blocked, as per another recent amendment to the CGST Rules. These regulatory changes aim to empower taxpayers to resolve liability differences proactively without direct intervention from tax authorities.
Understanding Rule 88C of CGST
The Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs (CBIC) introduced Rule 88C to the CGST Rules, enabling the GST portal to automatically send intimations for identified mismatches between GSTR-1 (or IFF) and GSTR-3B. These notifications are triggered when the tax liability declared in the GSTR-1/IFF surpasses that in the GSTR-3B by a specified amount or percentage. Under Rule 88C, taxpayers are required to either settle the differential tax liability, including interest under Section 50, via Form GST DRC-03 or present an explanation for the discrepancy on the common portal. While taxpayers have previously received notices for such mismatches, the updated GST law now grants the government the authority to demand unpaid liabilities, restrict return submissions, and initiate recovery actions.
About Form DRC-01B
Pursuant to Rule 88C, taxpayers exhibiting a tax payable in GSTR-1 (or IFF) that exceeds the amount reported in GSTR-3B by designated thresholds will receive an intimation through Part A of Form GST DRC-01B. This newly notified form will be used by the government to electronically inform non-compliant taxpayers on the GST portal about these differences, with a duplicate notification sent to their registered email addresses. Upon receiving this intimation, taxpayers have a seven-day window to either pay the differential tax liability, alongside interest under Section 50, using Form GST DRC-03 or to furnish an explanation for the discrepancies on the common portal. All responses, whether payment or explanation, must be submitted via Part B of Form GST DRC-01B.
Common Causes for GSTR-1 and GSTR-3B Discrepancies
Discrepancies between GSTR-1 and GSTR-3B typically stem from various issues, including:
- Reporting supplies correctly in GSTR-1 but under an incorrect section of GSTR-3B.
- Delays in reporting invoices and their corresponding debit or credit notes.
- Inadvertent duplication of an invoice in GSTR-1 or failure to record an invoice in GSTR-3B.
- Remitting taxes under an incorrect tax head or applying incorrect tax rates.
- Modifications made to supplies after the GSTR-1 return filing date.
- Data entry errors during reporting.
Implementation Date of Rule 88C
While the CBIC has officially notified Rule 88C, its precise effective date remains unannounced. This new regulation will only apply when tax payable mismatches between GSTR-1 and GSTR-3B exceed a certain, yet-to-be-specified, amount or percentage.
Response Deadline for DRC-01B
Taxpayers who receive an intimation under Rule 88C regarding differences in tax payable between their GSTR-1 and GSTR-3B are granted a seven-day period to respond. Within this timeframe, they must either settle the tax or provide a justification for the outstanding amount.
GSTR-1 Filing Blockage under Rule 59(6)
Rule 88C outlines the procedure for automated intimations concerning tax liability differences between GSTR-1 and GSTR-3B on the GST portal. For taxpayers who fail to comply with these intimations, the CBIC has amended the CGST Rules by adding a new clause (d) to Rule 59(6). This amendment permits the blocking of GSTR-1 filings for non-compliant taxpayers under Rule 88C. Consequently, the government can now prevent GSTR-1 filings for any taxpayer who does not respond promptly to the intimation issued under Rule 88C. Taxpayers will be restricted from using both Form GSTR-1 and the Invoice Furnishing Facility (IFF) for subsequent tax periods until they have either deposited the specified amounts or provided an acceptable explanation for non-payment.
Recovery Actions under Section 79
Should a taxpayer:
- Fail to pay the tax due as per Rule 88C, or
- Fail to offer an explanation for the unpaid tax, or
- Provide an explanation that the proper officer deems unacceptable,
the officer is authorized to initiate recovery proceedings under Section 79 of the Act.